An Herbal Myth Challenged: Does Echinacea's immune
system activity diminish with continuous use?
by Ed Smith
I am on a mission to dispel the modern herbal myth that people
should not take the herb Echinacea for long periods of time because its immune-enhancing
activity diminishes with repeated and continuous dosing. Unfortunately this
misinformation has now become “common knowledge,” although it has never been
scientifically or clinically proven. This myth evolved from the “theory” that
because Echinacea “stimulates” the immune system its continuous use will cause
the immune system to “fatigue” and diminish its activity. Interestingly, the
medical and pharmacological researchers of Echinacea do not refer to the herb
as an immuno-STIMULANT, but in-stead use the term immuno-MODULATOR, which much
better describes Echinacea's pharmacodynamics.
Extensive medical and pharmacological research on Echinacea has revealed multiple
immuno-modulating actions (e.g., increases phagocytic action of immune cells,
enhances properdin/complement system, enhances production of alpha-1 & -2 gamma
globulins, inhibits hyaluronidase enzyme activity and enhances polymerization
of hyaluronic acid, enhances wound healing by augmenting growth of healthy
new connective tissue, increases killer T-cell production, inhibits tumor growth,
is anti-inflammatory, increases interferon levels and is thereby anti-viral,
and more). However, all this research has never shown any evidence which indicates
that any of these immuno-modulating actions are decreased by continued use
of Echinacea.
But let's set science aside for a moment and look at Echinacea's clinical use
by the Eclectic physicians who practiced medicine from the mid-1880s until
the 1930s. Tens of thousands of Eclectic physicians prescribed hundreds of
millions of doses of Echinacea for many decades and yet in their voluminous
medical texts and journals they never once mentioned anything about diminished
curative success with Echinacea (for any reason). If they did indeed see such,
one would assume it would have been mentioned in their literature at least
once, if not scores of times. And while their empirical evidence cannot be
considered scientific proof, I have much confidence in the bedside experience
of these physicians who “saw it all.”
I have offered a friendly challenge to several prominent herbalists and herbal
authors who claim Echinacea's immuno-activity diminishes with continuous use.
I've asked them to supply at least one reference that supports their claim
-- either from modern medical research, or from the Eclectic or Physiomedicalist
literature, or from traditional folk medicine sources. So far no one has been
able to supply even one reference. For me, I have to have something in order
to believe -- either modern scientific evidence or historical references, and
definitely more than theory and conjecture alone. What I do know for sure is
that Echinacea “works” -- and does its immunomodulating job dose, after dose,
after dose, after ...